Skip to main content
ExLibris
  • Subscribe by RSS
  • Ex Libris Knowledge Center

    Duplicate fields being printed with p_print_08

    • Article Type: General
    • Product: Aleph
    • Product Version: 16.02

    Description:
    I'm producing a serials list using p-print-08 ... it looks like this (of course, it's in columnar format)

    1555-9203 1525-8599
    1555-9203 1525-8599##
    Evidence-based ophthalmology.
    Optometry Library Periodical Collection SHELVED ALPHABETICALLY Vol.6- (2005-)
    Optometry Library Periodical Collection SHELVED ALPHABETICALLY Vol.6- (2005-)##

    1557-5411 0742-0277
    1557-5411 0742-0277##
    Diverse issues in higher education.
    Optometry Library Periodical Collection SHELVED ALPHABETICALLY W/CURRENT PERIODICALS Current Year Only
    Optometry Library Periodical Collection SHELVED ALPHABETICALLY W/CURRENT PERIODICALS Current Year Only##

    Note the duplicate ISSN and duplicate holdings lines (one with; one without ## at the end)

    My rep_tab_short.eng looks like this:
    005 L ISSN 022## 025 02 C01 ---
    005 L Title 245## 025 02 C01 ---
    005 L Holding 866## 025 02 C01 --- Y

    I've played around with edit_field and edit_paragraph, just in case that was the problem, but I had no effect on the output.

    I'd like to get rid of these extra lines ... where's the expand that's doing it (assuming that it IS an expand)

    PRINT-COL expand_doc_bib_loc_1_a
    PRINT-COL expand_doc_bib_loc_1_b
    PRINT-COL expand_doc_bib_loc_1_c
    PRINT-COL expand_doc_sort_loc_b
    PRINT-COL expand_doc_bib_loc_2_a
    PRINT-COL expand_doc_bib_loc_3_a
    PRINT-COL expand_doc_bib_loc_4_a
    PRINT-COL expand_doc_bib_loc_cleanup
    ! 5/16/02
    PRINT-COL expand_doc_type tab_type_config_typ
    !PRINT-COL expand_doc_fmt_mgu
    PRINT-COL expand_doc_join_simple
    PRINT-COL expand_doc_extract
    PRINT-COL expand_doc_bib_hol_usm

    Resolution:
    The site resolved the problem:

    edit_field.eng was the culprit. In the header to edit_field it notes that the "S" is used for pc_tab_short.eng, it does NOT note that this is also used by rep_tab_short.eng. Since there was no "S" defined for the 022 and the 866, p-print-08 pulled the 022 and 866 as is AND added the # section from edit_field. There WAS an "S" for the 245.


    • Article last edited: 10/8/2013