When using Mutliple MFHD Bulk Import Rules the value for subfield "t" is not being mapped from the MARC import to the Voyager holdings record
- Product: Voyager
- Relevant for Installation Type: Multi-Tenant Direct, Dedicated-Direct, Local, TotalCare
Symptoms
The value for subfield "t" is not being mapped to the holdings record when using Multiple MFHD Import Rules.
Defect Status
VYG-7696 is resolved in Voyager version 10.3
Replication Steps
- Create an import record file that has the subfield "t" in the mapped MFHD field.
Example:=852 \\$bmain$hNB354.N6$iA3$t1$zCopy 1$x39002139729827
- Create a bulk import rule using Multiple MFHD profile (i.e., Import Bibs, MFHDs, Multiple Items)
- Ensure Multiple MFHD has the Item Tag field t configured in the 'Copy number {t}'
- Run Bulk Import
- Resulting MFHD will not include "t" subfield
Workaround
Manually update MFHD.
- Article last edited: 01-Feb-2021